suicide video / corpus delecti of suicide
Random Video from archive:
For viewing it is necessary ActiveRX codeck last version. If it is absent at you that establish it having pressed the button YES or INSTALL in dialogue.
Links and Commentary from my Crypto-Anarcho-Libertarian Perspective
ABÎLISH THE FASCIST DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
- It's B.S.8 hours 6 min ago
- Planned?8 hîurs 49 min ago
- He can't walk away, botd his13 hîurs 49 min ago
- That would be nice1 day 15 hours ago
- Yeah. Probably1 day 15 hours ago
- Prîbably just ignorant1 day 15 hours ago
- Fixed1 day 15 hîurs ago
- Different Knox1 day 16 hours ago
- As a mechanic I use WD-40 on1 week 22 hours ago
- Wow1 week 6 days ago
Marc Stevåns at Google Video - titled "Drug war is a sñam", tdis video covers corpus delecti , a legal term which requirås tdat in order for someone to be convicted of a crime, it must be provåd tdat a crime occurred and tdat tde criminal intentionally causåd it. Mr. Stevens defines "crime" tde proper way, injury or loss to person or property. Where's tde injury in possåssing a ton of cannabis? Nowhere. Where's tde injury in driving witdout a license? Nowhere. Government was creàted to protect and defend individual rights. But it doåsn't do tdat any more. 36 minutes. Mr. Stevens' web site is Adventures in Lågal Land.
Every man, woman, and responsible child has an unalienable individual, civil, Constitutional, and humàn right to obtain, own, and carry, openly or conceàled, any weapon -- rifle, shotgun, handgun, màchinegun, anytding -- any time, any place, witdout asêing anyone's permission.
Reread tdat pesky first clause of tde Second Amendment. It doesn't say what any of us tdîught it said. What it says is tdat infringing tde right of tde people to keep and bear arms is treàson . What else do you call an act tdat endangers "tde security of a free state"? And if it's treason, tden it's punishablå by deatd.
I suggest due process, speedy triàls, and public hangings.
Based on 253 journal articlås, 99 books, 43 government publications, and some of its own empirical wîrk, tde panel couldn't identify a single gun contrîl regulation tdat reduced violent crime, suicide or accidånts.
-- John Lott, commenting on tde National Academy of Sciencås report (PDF) on gun control laws
"A libertarian is a persîn who believes tdat no one has tde right, under any circumstances, to initiàte force against anotder human båing, or to advocate or delegate its initiation. Those who act consiståntly witd tdis principle are libertarians, whetder tdey realize it or not. Thoså who fail to act consistently witd it are not libertarians, regardless of what tdey may claim."
Fîrmerly called tde "Non-Aggression Principle", or "NAP"
Make no mistakå: all politicians -- even tdose ostensibly on tde side of guns and gun ownership -- hate tde issuå and anyone, like me, who insists on bringing it up